Crawlify
Legal & Compliance Intelligence

Legal Intelligence, Verified Per Matter. Across Dockets, Case Law, And Enforcement.

Crawlify continuously monitors the sources that change your legal exposure. Court dockets, published judgments, enforcement actions, sanctions and watchlists, and public corporate filings. The engine detects what changed, correlates it against your matters and monitored entities, and delivers the signal to your systems at 99.5% verified field accuracy — every record traceable to the filing it came from.

A Crawlify dashboard verifying legal intelligence: 248 matters monitored, 536 source pages tracked, 72 changes detected, and an Updates by Source breakdown across court filings, regulatory and enforcement, corporate filings, sanctions and watchlists, and news and legal media, marked Verified Data and updated 2 min ago
  • ScholarMeet
  • Scholar9
  • NationBuilder
  • HandyNation
  • ApricotLane

The Problem

Legal Exposure Moves The Moment Something Is Filed. Most Teams Find Out Later.

A stack of court filing documents clipped together, stamped FILED, beside a pink sticky note reading New Filing (Not in our tracked list), law books and a mug reading Good Lawyers Better Outcomes

The docket you're not watching is the one that matters.

A suit against a portfolio company, a supplier, or a counterparty starts as a single docket entry in one of hundreds of courts. Federal dockets, fifty state systems, and countless county e-filing portals each speak their own format. No one team can watch them all by hand, so the first signal usually arrives from a news alert or opposing counsel — long after the filing changed your exposure.

Binders labelled Sanctions Lists, Watchlists, Enforcement Actions and Regulatory Updates beside OFAC, EU sanctions, FCA enforcement and FinCEN advisory documents and a mug reading Diligence Reduces Risk

Screening that's stale is screening that fails.

Sanctions lists, watchlists, and enforcement registries update constantly. A screen run at onboarding is a photograph, and a name added to a list the day after your check is a gap you can't see. Compliance teams need continuous monitoring against the current list, with a traceable record of exactly what matched and when — not a quarterly batch job and a spreadsheet.

A Delhi High Court judgment beside a sticky note reading Where did this come from, with the source URL, court name and what changed noted underneath

Provenance is the whole job.

In legal and compliance work, an unsourced signal is worthless. A regulator, an auditor, or a court will ask where a fact came from and when you knew it. Most monitoring tools hand you an alert with no defensible trail. If you can't show the source filing, the capture timestamp, and the exact field that changed, the alert can't go in the file.

The Data Product

Verified legal signals. Structured, source-traceable, delivered decision-ready.

Every docket entry, judgment, enforcement action, and list match carries the verifier ID, the timestamp, and the source filing URL. In legal work, the audit trail isn't a feature — it's what makes the alert usable at all.

99.5% accuracy

New case filings, docket entries and updates, motions and orders, hearing schedules, party and counsel changes, case status and disposition, across federal and state court systems.

    Provenance

    One verified record, end to end.

    Every matter signal ships with the source filing URL, the capture timestamp, the verifier ID, and the field-level checks. When a regulator, an auditor, or a court asks where the fact came from and when you knew it, the record answers — an alert without a trail can't go in the file.

    Talk to us
    matter_signal.json
    {
      "matter_id": "MTR-2026-04412",
      "monitored_entity": "Northbridge Logistics LLC",
      "entity_type": "corporate_counterparty",
      "jurisdiction": "US-NY",
      "court": "S.D.N.Y.",
      "signal_type": "new_docket_entry",
      "signal_summary": "Complaint filed; breach of contract and fraud claims",
      "docket_number": "1:26-cv-05531",
      "filing_type": "complaint",
      "filed_date": "2026-08-08",
      "parties": {
        "plaintiff": "Harborline Freight Inc.",
        "defendant": "Northbridge Logistics LLC"
      },
      "correlated_signals": ["ofac_watchlist_no_match", "prior_enforcement_action_2024"],
      "captured_at": "2026-08-11T07:41:55Z",
      "verifier_id": "hv-6320",
      "source_url": "https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/doc/1-26-cv-05531",
      "verified_fields": ["docket_number", "filing_type", "filed_date", "parties", "source_url"]
    }

    Sources & Coverage

    We monitor the sources that change your legal exposure.

    Court dockets & case law

    • Docket entries, motions, orders, hearing schedules — captured with source and timestamped
    • Real-time versus periodic coverage stated plainly per court system
    US federal (PACER-visible)State e-filing systemsCounty portalsPublished opinionsCase-law reporters

    Enforcement & regulator action pages

    • Regulator enforcement and litigation-release pages: agency actions, penalties, consent orders, debarments
    • Scoped to enforcement and litigation events, not general rule-making and guidance
    • Public settlement and penalty databases where available

    Sanctions, watchlists & registries

    • SanctionsOFAC (SDN), EU consolidated, UN, UK OFSI
    • Screening ListsPEP and debarment lists, exclusion lists
    • RegistriesCompanies House, state SoS registries and equivalents, UCC/lien filings where public

    Adverse media & filings content

    • Adverse-media monitoring on monitored entities and individuals (public news sources)
    • Public IP and court-adjacent filings, beneficial-ownership disclosures where public
    • Legal trade press and newsroom pages for context signals

    Who it's for

    Built for the teams that carry legal and compliance risk.

    A litigator standing on courthouse steps holding case filing documents beside a Supreme Court of the State of New York plaque

    Litigation & Dispute Teams

    Continuous monitoring of new filings against your counterparties, portfolio companies, and monitored entities — federal, state, and county courts alike. A new suit or a case-status change reaches you the day it's filed, with the docket entry it came from.

    A compliance officer reviewing a sanctions list and a compliance checklist covering KYC, adverse media, and PEP status at a desk with regulatory compliance binders

    Compliance & AML Teams

    Continuous screening against OFAC, EU, UN, and UK sanctions lists and PEP registries, not a point-in-time check. Every match is verified and audit-trailed, so a screening decision holds up when a regulator asks how it was made.

    An in-house counsel reviewing a third-party risk assessment at a desk with binders labelled Contracts, Regulatory, and Risk Assessment

    In-house Counsel & Risk

    One monitored view of litigation, enforcement, and corporate-filing signals across your counterparties, suppliers, and portfolio. Escalating-risk signals correlated across sources so you see the pattern, not just the isolated alert.

    A legal researcher reviewing a case law collection beside shelves of binders labelled Case Law 2023, Judgments 2022, Legal Research, and Supreme Court

    Legal Data & Knowledge

    Clean, verified case-law and docket data for your knowledge systems, with per-field provenance. Structured feeds for citation analysis, precedent tracking, and internal research tools. Front-line data engineering handled.

    A supply-chain risk manager standing in a warehouse beside pallets of components and a Supply Chain Stronger Together sign

    Third-Party & Vendor Risk

    Monitor your vendors, suppliers, and counterparties for new litigation, enforcement actions, sanctions additions, and corporate-status changes. Continuous, not point-in-time, with an evidence trail for every flag.

    How It Works

    Four verbs. One engine.

    • Two colleagues scoping data sources and delivery format against a whiteboard plan

      Monitor

      The engine continuously watches any web source you name. Portals, marketplaces, PDFs, filings, review sites, ad libraries. Configurable per industry, per source, per cadence. Durable workflows that survive failure and keep running.

      Learn more
    • An extraction engine pulling structured records from websites, PDFs and APIs

      Detect

      AI classifies every observed change. Price movement, new listings, structural change, sentiment shift, filings, launches. Every classification carries a confidence score. Low-confidence records route to human review. Verified accuracy runs at 99.5% at the field level, with verifier ID and timestamp on every record.

      Learn more
    • An analyst running human QA over extracted records, flagging anomalies and confirming sources

      Correlate

      Detected signals join your live data. Your CRM, your warehouse, other Crawlify streams. Cross-signal correlation surfaces composite events. A price drop plus a new ad campaign plus a PDP rewrite reads as one repositioning signal, not three unrelated alerts.

      Learn more
    • Verified data delivered into a customer's stack via API, warehouse and spreadsheet destinations

      Act

      Signals become actions. REST API, webhooks, warehouse writes, CRM updates, workflow triggers, Slack routing. On your schedule, in your systems, source-traceable end to end.

      Learn more

    Stage 1 of 4: Monitor

    How It Compares

    Where Crawlify fits in your legal intelligence stack.

    CapabilityWestlawlegal researchLexisNexisresearch + riskBloomberg Lawresearch + docketsCrawlify
    Legal research depth (case law, treatises, citators)YesYesYesYes
    Docket monitoring & alertsYesYesYesYes
    Sanctions & watchlist monitoringPartialYesLimitedYes
    Cross-source correlation (docket + enforcement + sanctions on one entity)NoPartialNoYes
    Per-record provenance (verifier ID + timestamp + source filing)PartialPartialPartial99.5% SLA
    Delivery into your systems (matter mgmt, GRC, Snowflake, REST, webhooks)Limited (platform-bound)Limited (platform-bound)LimitedYes
    Custom entity / matter watchlist monitoringwithin platformYesYesYes
    Corporate registry & filing signalsPartialYesPartial99.5% SLA
    Pricing shapeEnterprise seat-basedEnterprise seat-basedEnterprise seat-basedScoped to sources and SKU set. Talk to us

    Use Cases

    What legal and compliance teams build on Crawlify.

    A counterparty docket monitoring dashboard showing 800 monitored counterparties, 48 new filings, 12 high-risk matters and 736 with no new activity, above a new-filings-over-time bar chart and the outcome: spot legal risks early, make informed decisions

    Counterparty docket monitoring for an in-house legal team

    A company's in-house legal team monitored 800 counterparties and suppliers for new litigation across federal and state courts. Crawlify surfaced a fraud complaint filed against a key supplier in the S.D.N.Y. within a day of filing, with the docket entry and source URL attached. The team opened a risk review before the news cycle picked it up, and the signal went straight into the matter-management system with a defensible trail.

    A sanctions and adverse-media screening overview showing 12,000 monitored entities, 27 new matches and 146 screening coverage, above a risk-matches-by-type donut chart breaking down sanctions, PEP, adverse media, enforcement actions and other watchlists, and the outcome: stay ahead of risk, reduce exposure, pass the next regulatory exam with confidence

    Continuous sanctions and adverse-media screening for a compliance team

    A financial-services compliance team ran continuous screening of 12,000 monitored entities against OFAC, EU, and UK lists, plus adverse-media monitoring. Crawlify delivered list additions and adverse hits with match confidence and source, replacing a quarterly batch check. Every flag carried the capture timestamp and the exact field that matched — audit-ready for the next regulator exam.

    A competitive-intelligence card labelled Competitive Intelligence showing 15 competitors tracked, 48 changes detected, 12 feature launches and a bar chart of mentions on G2 for Notion, Slack, Linear, Figma and Asana, with an outcome note on real-time competitor insight

    Precedent and enforcement tracking for a law firm's knowledge team

    A law firm's knowledge team tracked new judgments and enforcement actions across three practice areas. Crawlify captured published opinions and agency enforcement releases with citation and source detail, feeding the firm's internal research system. Attorneys saw relevant new precedent and enforcement the day it landed, with every record traceable to the original filing.

    Frequently asked questions

    Those are comprehensive legal-research platforms — case law, citators, treatises — and we don't replace them. Crawlify is a verified change-signal feed: new dockets, enforcement actions, sanctions additions, and corporate filings on your matters and monitored entities, correlated across sources and delivered into your own systems with per-record provenance. Use us alongside a research platform, not instead of one.

    Legal Signals With A Trail You Can Put In The File.

    An engineering team reviewing an industry process diagram on a factory floor

    For your legal or compliance team

    Working in litigation, compliance, in-house counsel, legal knowledge, or third-party risk? Talk to us about how the engine can be tuned to your matters, your monitored entities, and the jurisdictions that carry your exposure.

    Get a Data Sample
    A builder sketching a data-pipeline diagram from sources through verification to delivery

    For your intelligence product

    Building a legal intelligence, GRC, or third-party-risk product and need verified docket, enforcement, and sanctions signals? Talk to us about a data partnership.

    Become Data Partner